Nova Fencing Club - Falls Church, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ABBOUD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 2 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | HULL Liam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | CARNALL Hunter | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 5 | PENNER Kyle D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 6 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 8 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | FU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 10 | TRITHART Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 2% |
| 11 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 16 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 17 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 19 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 21 | WEIDMAN Jess | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 24 | HVIDING Ketil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 25 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | GARCIA Carlos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 28 | ROINIOTIS Theodore | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 31 | MORA Genesis R. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PILIPOWSKYJ Luke | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 100% | 95% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SZYMCZYK Lex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 12% |
| 35 | FRENCH Phaelen | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | PANE Patrick | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SJOBERG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 40 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HUEY Curtis E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 42 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | DIAZ Brenna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | NAZIRALI Syedeen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 45 | VADDE Prateek | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | VADDE Pranav | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WEST Dale | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | LAZURAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 50 | THORN Evan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | PETRY Luke | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 52 | VENCILL Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | STERLING Henry | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | ERBER Liberty | 100% | 96% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | MARTIN Audrey | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.