John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Byron | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% |
2 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
3 | CHEN Wesley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
3 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
5 | CHOO Joseph W. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
6 | SHIN Sung (Andy) | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% | |
7 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
8 | MANZ Hamilton R. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
9 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
10 | JOSEPH William | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
11 | KROPP Jack | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
12 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
13 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
14 | FU Ethan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
16 | RACHEL Dylan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | NOWAK Jakub P. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% | |
18 | NALLAMSHETTY Ayan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | AMOROSO John | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
20 | SAKO Ayrton J. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | HUTTO Joshua | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 4% | |
22 | JACKSON James | 1% | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
23 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
24 | VALES Keyan | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 47% | 5% | |
25 | HAN Ethan | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
26 | LIN Harrison | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% | - | |
27 | SINGH Aryaman | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | SCHARF Ryan | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
29 | MALIKOV Zinnun | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
30 | ZHANG Caden | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | CUI Jack | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
32 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
33 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
34 | WANG Bryan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
35 | CAI Brian | - | - | 5% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 3% |
36 | KIM Dylan J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
37 | KENT Dwain | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
38 | DAVIS Jonah | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
39 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
40 | DAN Rex | 9% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
41 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | IFORD Andrew W. | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
43 | PATEL Kushal | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
44 | HU Robert J. | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
45 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
46 | CHUNG Joshua | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
47 | BERNARD Jack B. | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
48 | HONG Ryan | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
49 | AWAN Saqlain A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
50 | CHOI David | 47% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
51 | MALONE Jacob | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | SMALLWOOD Jaylon | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 1% |
53 | HEINZE Luke H. | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
54 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | LEE Aiden | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | LIU Dylan Y. | 1% | 10% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | DILLE Brice | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
57 | JUNG Joshua | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
59 | PAK Joel | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | JUNG Elliot | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | DILLE Jackson K. | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
62 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
63 | LE Kevin | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
64 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
65 | SMITH Christopher | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
66 | KE Sebastian | 34% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.