John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KROPP Jack | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 2 | SCHARF Ryan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | WU Byron | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 3 | LIN Harrison | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 5 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 6 | MODULLA Yathin R. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 7 | KIM Dylan J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 8 | ALLEY Everett T | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Caden | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | DAN Rex | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 12 | GATZA Logan | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 13 | WANG Bryan | - | - | 6% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 15 | SNYDER Ari | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | SINGH Aryaman | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 17 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 18 | CHUNG Joshua | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 19 | JACKSON James | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 20 | BENDER Rhys T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% |
| 21 | MEGGERS Davin | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | JOSEPH William | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
| 23 | HUTTO Joshua | - | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 24 | ALI Farhan | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SO Lorenzo | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 28 | JAAFAR Hamza | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | VALES Keyan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 6% |
| 30 | NALLAMSHETTY Ayan | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SARIKONDA Akhil | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 32 | MALIKOV Zinnun | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LEE Aiden | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | BERNARD Jack B. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Dylan Y. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | CUI Jack | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
| 37 | HAN Ethan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | JUNG Elliot | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | DAVIS Jonah | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 40 | PATEL Kushal | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 41 | JUNG Joshua | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | DILLE Jackson K. | 3% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MODANLOU Navid | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | HU Robert J. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 8% | 36% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | FU Ethan | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | NICKERSON Oliver | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 49 | RUIZ Jayden | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MILLER Jonathan | 15% | 44% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | FORAIDA Khalid | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HONG Ryan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | CHOI Adam | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CARO Seph | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | MUELLER Will | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PAK Joel | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 15% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | RUSSELL Tallis | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | CHOI David | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | KASTNER Benjamin | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.