John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
2 | SCHARF Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
3 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
3 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
5 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
6 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
7 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
8 | ALLEY Everett T | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
9 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
10 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
11 | DAN Rex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
12 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
13 | WANG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 2% |
14 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
15 | SNYDER Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
16 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
17 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
18 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
19 | JACKSON James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
20 | BENDER Rhys T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 13% |
21 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
22 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
23 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
24 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
25 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
26 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
27 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
28 | JAAFAR Hamza | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | VALES Keyan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 6% |
30 | NALLAMSHETTY Ayan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
31 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
32 | MALIKOV Zinnun | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
33 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
34 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
35 | LIU Dylan Y. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
36 | CUI Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
37 | HAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
38 | JUNG Elliot | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
39 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
40 | PATEL Kushal | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
41 | JUNG Joshua | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
45 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
46 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 100% | 92% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
47 | FU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
48 | NICKERSON Oliver | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
49 | RUIZ Jayden | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
50 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 85% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
51 | FORAIDA Khalid | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | HONG Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
53 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
54 | CHOI Adam | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | CARO Seph | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | MUELLER Will | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | PAK Joel | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
58 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
59 | RUSSELL Tallis | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
59 | CHOI David | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | KASTNER Benjamin | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.