The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

The Southern RYC/RJCC/ROC (D1A/DV2/VET) & Non-Regional Team

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, December 18, 2022 at 8:00 AM

John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KROPP Jack 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 55%
2 SCHARF Ryan 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 18% 2%
3 WU Byron 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 30%
3 LIN Harrison 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 5%
5 CLICK Aiden 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 59%
6 MODULLA Yathin R. 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
7 KIM Dylan J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 68% 23%
8 ALLEY Everett T 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 19% 2%
9 CHAWLA Armaan 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
10 ZHANG Caden 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 27% 4%
11 DAN Rex 100% 99% 90% 60% 23% 4% -
12 GATZA Logan 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 49%
13 WANG Bryan 100% 100% 100% 93% 63% 20% 2%
14 GLENNON Sebastian J. 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 5%
15 SNYDER Ari 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 12% 1%
16 SINGH Aryaman 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5%
17 MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
18 CHUNG Joshua 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 9%
19 JACKSON James 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
20 BENDER Rhys T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 58% 13%
21 MEGGERS Davin 100% 99% 91% 62% 27% 6% 1%
22 JOSEPH William 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 36%
23 HUTTO Joshua 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
24 ALI Farhan 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1% -
25 SO Lorenzo 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3%
26 VACCARO Dominick J. 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 3%
27 WANG Maxwell L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 22%
28 JAAFAR Hamza 100% 90% 59% 24% 6% 1% -
29 VALES Keyan 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 6%
30 NALLAMSHETTY Ayan 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 10% 1%
31 SARIKONDA Akhil 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
32 MALIKOV Zinnun 100% 99% 90% 60% 24% 4% -
33 LEE Aiden 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 3% -
34 BERNARD Jack B. 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 7% 1%
35 LIU Dylan Y. 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
36 CUI Jack 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 10%
37 HAN Ethan 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
38 JUNG Elliot 100% 92% 57% 20% 3% - -
39 DAVIS Jonah 100% 99% 90% 63% 25% 4%
40 PATEL Kushal 100% 99% 87% 57% 22% 4%
41 JUNG Joshua 100% 96% 73% 35% 9% 1%
42 DILLE Jackson K. 100% 97% 76% 39% 10% 1%
43 ROCKWELL Nolan 100% 55% 14% 2% - - -
44 MODANLOU Navid 100% 92% 58% 19% 3% - -
45 HU Robert J. 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 2% -
46 SHAFRITZ Noah 100% 92% 56% 14% 1% - -
47 FU Ethan 100% 100% 99% 87% 47% 11% 1%
48 NICKERSON Oliver 100% 98% 84% 51% 19% 4% -
49 RUIZ Jayden 100% 58% 14% 1% - - -
50 MILLER Jonathan 100% 85% 41% 8% 1% - -
51 FORAIDA Khalid 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
52 HONG Ryan 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
53 MCDANIEL Eamon 100% 91% 59% 22% 4% - -
54 CHOI Adam 100% 58% 17% 2% - - -
55 CARO Seph 100% 56% 16% 3% - -
56 MUELLER Will 100% 53% 14% 2% - - -
57 PAK Joel 100% 55% 15% 2% - -
58 RODRIGUEZ Tyler 100% 85% 42% 11% 1% - -
59 RUSSELL Tallis 100% 93% 62% 21% 3% - -
59 CHOI David 100% 63% 21% 3% - - -
61 KASTNER Benjamin 100% 54% 15% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.