Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | NGUYEN Tate | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 5 | KARNAS Karol | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 6 | ZIEGLER John | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | GRAVES Lawson | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | BORISENKO Samuel | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 9 | SPINA Joseph B. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 10 | TASKIRAN Mete | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | AGARWAL Adheesh | V D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | CURTY Jack | V V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | SHOUSHA Yassin | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | HUANG Kenneth | V D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | DAS Roshan | D V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | MISHRA Milan B. | D V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | PETROVICH Alexandar | V V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 19 | GROOTHUIS David | D V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 20 | MITEV Alexander | D V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | SHOUSHA Hamza | V D D V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 22 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | DUNKLIN Cameron | V D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 24 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | D D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 25 | MURAD Humza | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 26 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 27 | ERICKSON Paulie | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 28 | WILLIAMS Logan | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 29 | SANDERSON Eli | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | TIMEK Jan | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | CHEN Bowen | D D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 32 | PATEL Aayan | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | STOKER Elliott | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | EICHORN Frederick | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 35 | LEHNER Brian | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.