Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
2 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
3 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 3% | |
3 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
5 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
6 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
7 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
8 | WONG Baron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
9 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% |
10 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
11 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | |
12 | MA Houhin | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
13 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% | |
14 | FU Adrian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
15 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | DU Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
18 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
19 | DAI Steven (Chengwen) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | 1% | |
20 | MARZBANI Zehl | 100% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
21 | WANG Devin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
22 | WU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
23 | AUSTIN Atlas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
24 | XUE Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
25 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
26 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | MA kevin | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
28 | OBERDERFER Viktor | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
29 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
30 | LIM Marcus | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
31 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
33 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
34 | KIM Evan | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
35 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
36 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | - |
37 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
38 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
40 | DAYMAN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.