The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
2 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
3 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
3 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
5 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
7 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
8 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
9 | BERMENDER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
10 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
11 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 6% |
12 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
13 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
14 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
15 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
16 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
17 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
18 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
20 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 99% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
21 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | 2% |
22 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
23 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
24 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 22% |
25 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
26 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
28 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
29 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
29 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
31 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
32 | GETSIN Anthony | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
34 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
35 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
36 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
37 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
38 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
39 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
40 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
41 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
41 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
43 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
44 | FULTON Richard A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
45 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
46 | CLAYMAN John A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
47 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
48 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
49 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | WONG Evan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
51 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | PARK Brandon | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
53 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 99% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
54 | CRACRAFT John R. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
55 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
56 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
57 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | LIU William | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | KHER Roan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | SAH Steven | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
62 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
63 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
64 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
65 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
66 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 95% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
67 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 21% |
68 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
69 | ADAMS Cedric | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
70 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 2% |
71 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
72 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
73 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
74 | LUI Justin | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
75 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
76 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.