MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
2 | NOWAK Jakub P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
3 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
3 | MICKO Fritz K. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | |
5 | CHAI Jonathan | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
6 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
7 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
8 | KANAR Ian | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
9 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
10 | LOISEAU Eliott | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
11 | YANG Edward | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
12 | ZHAI Avalo | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
13 | DITTEL Aaron K. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
14 | LOESER Jacob | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | |
16 | VEZMAR Evan H. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
17 | WU Byron | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
18 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | CONKLIN Jim | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | |
19 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
22 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
23 | KARNAS Karol | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
24 | PAULSEN Zachary | 5% | 26% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
25 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 1% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
26 | BENFORD Kailan | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
27 | SWANSON Dave | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
28 | DENNIS Ethan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | CHAI Ethan | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
30 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
31 | KENT Dwain | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
32 | MING Nathan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
33 | HU Robert J. | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
34 | ALI Adam | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
35 | MILLER Lance W. | 6% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
36 | PIENTA Chris J. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 37% | 9% |
37 | VELINOV Gabriel | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
38 | YANG Zeke | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | MALEADY Sean | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
40 | WHEELER Mark C. | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - |
41 | SAMUEL Nirmel | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
42 | ARNEMANN Jonas | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | ELTERMAN Lev | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | GREENE Patrick | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.