Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | RACHTCHININE Alexandre | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
3 | TRAN Dai Long | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | KROPP Jack | V D V D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
5 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
6 | DOAN Joseph M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
7 | SNYDER IV William B. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
9 | SCHWARTZ Elliott | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
10 | BAGHA Armin | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
11 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
12 | CHAWLA Armaan | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
13 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | D V D V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
14 | LEE Daniel Y. | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
15 | WALTHER Bryan M. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
16 | HODGE Jaydon L. | V D D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
17 | CHEN Wesley | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | ADLER Ethan M. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
19 | PARK Ian C. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
20 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
21 | DUDLEY Logan M. | D V V V V D | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
22 | COMBS Colson | V D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | SKEATE Jonathan F. | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
24 | RINEHART Conner M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
25 | RHYU Kozmo | V D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
26 | LU Sebastian X. | V V V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
27 | TRIMMER Colin | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
28 | KING Cameron | V V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
29 | WU Byron | V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
30 | HUGHES Michael D. | D D D V V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
31 | GISLER Benjamin B. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
32 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
33 | DIETRICH Sam | D V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
34 | KELLISH Jeffery L. | V D V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
35 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | D V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
36 | LEE Shwan | V D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
37 | HALL Timothy | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
38 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | D V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
39 | PICCUS Isaac S. | D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
40 | PARK Prestan S. | V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
41 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | D D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
42 | EVANS Allen L. | V D V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
43 | HERMAN Nathan | D D D D V V | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
44 | PARK Vincent | D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
45 | SNYDER John W. | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
46 | WRIGHT Max | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
47 | LI Benjamin | D V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
48 | GAMBINO Robert A. | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
49 | TATE Leon J. | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
50 | LU Qi | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
51 | SCHULZE Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
52 | CAMMETT William J. | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
53 | ROSENBERGER III Paul | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
54 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
55 | MOORE Guy L. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
55 | MARSH Alex | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
57 | HERNANDEZ Agustin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
58 | SMITH Steven | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
59 | SAUNDERS Eric | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
60 | FLORES Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.