DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHELANSKI Isaac | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | SU Caleb | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 5 | CARPENTER Liam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 6 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 7 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 8 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 9 | CHEN Eric | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 10 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 11 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 44% | 20% |
| 12 | WHEELER Daniel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 14 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | LEE Aiden | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | CARTER Austin L. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | LEE Samuel Y. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% | |
| 21 | SO Lorenzo | 3% | 27% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 20% |
| 23 | CHEN Brian | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 24 | WEICHT Wesley W. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | ROBERT Oliver | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | JACKSON James | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% | |
| 27 | STEPHENS Corbin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | HEARNE Gavin | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | KWOUN Miles S. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HARDY Tristan L. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | DAN Rex | 5% | 36% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | HULL Liam | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | EVANS Allen L. | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | MODANLOU Navid | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | ASHER Valerie | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ZELENSKY Paul | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 40 | BOGDANOVSKAYA Elizaveta | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BUI Ryan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.