The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Fortune Fencing SYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 NICOLETTI Luca V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. V V D V V V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
3 DERRICK Blake V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 LO Preston V V V V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
5 FUKUDA Diego V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
6 WU Alber Y. V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
7 NGUYEN Martin V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
8 MORROW Brenden V D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
9 RASMUSSEN Sage V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
10 LI Samuel V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
11 ZHANG Aaron V V V V V D V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
12 DINSAY Kristjan D V V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
13 KETTELLE John D V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
14 PONS Diego V V V V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
15 CHEN Hanson V V D V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
16 YU Jason V V V D D V V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
17 LING Eddie V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
18 CHEN Charlie Tian-You V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
19 YANG Charles V V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
20 BIELER Mason V V V V V D V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
21 LIU Zixian (Aaron) V D V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
22 CAJERO Luis O. V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
23 LEE Jayden J. V D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
24 ZHANG Jacob V V V D D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 LE Jacob H. D V V V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
25 PINCHENG Yao V V V V D D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
27 OROPEZA David V D D V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
28 NAVARRO Kato V V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
29 ZHANG Matthew V V D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
30 FUKUDA Brando D V V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
31 TALASILA Arush V V D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
32 RAUTUREAU Arthur D D D V D V V D 2.7 1 -1.7
33 HUANG Jonathan V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
34 CHUANG Oscar V V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
35 PARK William V V D V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
36 WONG Evan V V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
37 WONG Yuheng Isaac V V V D V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
38 PARK Rion V V D V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
39 NGAI Julian V D V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
40 LI Toby V V D V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
41 TSAY Jordan R. D D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
42 RAUTUREAU Hugo V D V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
43 ZHONG Maxwell V D V V D V V D 1.5 4 +2.5
43 PARK David D V D V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
45 CHANG Jeremy V D D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
46 CHANG Jonathan V V D V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
47 GORDON William L. V V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
48 SISINNI Leonardo D V D V V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
49 SAH Steven V D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
50 AGRAWAL Niki V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
51 XIE Buster V D V D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
52 LIU William V D V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 LI Edison M. D V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
54 LAM Nicolas V V V D D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
55 RYOU Andy V D V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
56 ZHANG Graham D V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
57 CHEN Matthew D V V D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
58 CHOI Ethan D D D V V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
59 ROZALSKI Eli D D D V D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
60 ZHANG Raphael D V V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
61 LEE JISUNG D V D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
62 LEE SIYUN D D D D V V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
63 FLANAGAN Miles D D D D D V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
64 ORNELAS Matteo D D D D D D V D 1.6 0 -1.6
65 RODRIGUEZ Tyler V V V V V D 2.2 5 +2.8
66 BAE Eugene V V D V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 ZHOU Ryan V D V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
68 KIM Jonah V D D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
69 DENG David D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
70 SEIGEL Duncan V V D D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
71 CHOI Ethan D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
72 TULYAG Azim V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
73 LU Kevin D V V V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
74 ZHOU Shawn V D V D V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
75 PARK Steve (Sangmin) V D V V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
76 CHAN Joseph D D V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
77 KIM Andrew V V D D D V D 1.0 3 +2.0
78 HUANG Nathan V D D V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
79 NISHIHIRA Tyler D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
80 KIM Daniel Y. V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
81 ZHANG Lucas D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
82 ZHAN Kevin D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
83 YU ZiRun (Kinton) D D V D V D D 3.6 2 -1.6
84 CHANG Nathan D D D V V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
85 CHANG Eric Jonathan V D D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 CHOI Benjamin D D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
87 TSOI Spencer D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 LI Gen D V D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
89 ZHANG Andrew V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
90 ZHANG Jayden D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
90 CHUN Dashel D D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
92 PONTOPPIDAN Erik D D V D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
93 YOU Alan D V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
94 SHORTER David Alexander D D V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
95 LING Carson Jr D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
95 HOU Xiaolin (Kobe) D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
97 KULKARNI Karan D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
98 LEE Euan D D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
99 DANIEL Nikith D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
100 LOZANO Veyron Jericho D D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
101 WONG Braxton V D D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
102 WU Thomas D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
103 FOY Grant D D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
103 LEE Daniel D V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
105 PE Noah D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
105 MITCHELL Max D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
107 DULAI Agam D V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
108 GALLO Michael V D D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
109 LEE Mason D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
110 UPENDER West D D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
111 MONTGOMERY Georgie D D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
112 LIANG Ethan D D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
113 PETROV Mikhail D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
114 BOYNTON Alex D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
115 LI Richard D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
116 MANIKTALA Suvir D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
117 GUO Joey D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
117 BANUELOS Dario D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
119 MA Oliver D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
120 DEJOURNETT Jacob D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
121 HE Bourne D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
121 JACOB Ezra D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.