Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LI Brandon H. | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
2 | EMMER Chase T. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
3 | DOBBINS Evan W. | D V D V V D | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
3 | TAQI Ahmad F. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
5 | MA Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
6 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
7 | YU Vinni | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
8 | KIM Nicholas W. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
9 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | SHAFAIE Ali | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
11 | LUTAR Lucas N. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
12 | BATRAK Alexander | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
13 | KASI Sanjay | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
15 | ZHAO Jason L. | V D D V D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
16 | JANG Jaewon | V V D D D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
17 | LIU Niles J. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | DING Jonathan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
19 | SINGH Dayaal | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
20 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
21 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
22 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
23 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | D V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
24 | HEWES Thomas G. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | CHIN Jason Y. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
26 | CHENG Thomas C. | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
27 | HARTMARK Anders | D V D V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
28 | ZHANG Henry C. | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
29 | CHENG Jonathan | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
30 | LOCKWOOD Owen | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
31 | WU Alexander | V V V D D D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
32 | LAUN Drew P. | D D D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
33 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
34 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
35 | BADRIGIAN William H. | V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
36 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V D V V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
37 | KAO Castor T. | V D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
38 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V D V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
40 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | D V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
41 | MANGE Nathan | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
42 | ADLER David R. | D V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
43 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
44 | MARSHALL Ian | V V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
45 | CRALEY Thomas M. | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
46 | RECHLER Logan | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | ONIK Elijah T. | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
48 | RITCHIE Luke W. | V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
49 | WANG Michael | D D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
50 | TUMMINGS C.J. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
50 | HU Robin | V D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
52 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
53 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
54 | BAE Kevin | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
55 | KAZA Nitish | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
56 | LIAO Alex J. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
57 | HERGERT Benito | D D V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
58 | VANNI Filippo A. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
58 | DU Samuel R. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
60 | KWON Ethan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
62 | GALLUCCI Charles John | V D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
63 | CAI Oliver K. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
64 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
65 | GU Jeffrey | V D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
66 | JOHNSON Cooper A. | D D V D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
67 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | V D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
68 | NAGER Noah | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
69 | CHAN Tyler | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
70 | LE Vyn A. | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
71 | WU Nicholas | D D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
72 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
73 | SANTULLI Tristan | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
74 | STURGIS Zachary C. | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
75 | AHN Jun | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
76 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
77 | ZHAO Jesse | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
78 | DAUM Charlie | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
79 | ZHONG Guoren | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
80 | MCLENDON Diego | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
81 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
82 | WANG Alex L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
83 | BERGER Cameron D. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
83 | BOUSSY Luciano | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
85 | VENKATESH Aditya | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
86 | WANG Gerald Y. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
87 | SCHOFIELD Benjamin J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
87 | XU Mathu Yang | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
89 | JUSTUS Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.