Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 2 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 3 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 14% |
| 3 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
| 5 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 6 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 11 | XI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | ALABI Tobi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | PETROV Niki A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 15 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 17 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 18 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 19 | JONELEIT Aidan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 21 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 25 | WU Colin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | SETO Jing | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | KANG Brandon | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | YU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 34 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | LI Jade | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LI Ray | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SCHAUER Oliver | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Jaden | 100% | 97% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | DUSSELDORP Max | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.