Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 2 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 5 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 6 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | GREENBAUM Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 8 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 10 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 11 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 12 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | COTLAR Andrew D. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | FOLEY Kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 18 | DAMIANI Paolo | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | KANE Tim | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 20 | BINDAS Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 21 | MRAK Michael R. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 23 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | MANOUKIAN David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | CHELNITSKY Yuriy | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | TREANOR Donald K. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | TATE Leon J. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | VAN GOLEN Kenneth L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KATOPES Peter | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 34 | MACKINNON Russell H. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.