Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
2 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
3 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
3 | CAUCHY Eliot | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
5 | CHAI Ethan | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
6 | REPIC Oliver | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
7 | WU Colin | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
8 | SHA Michael | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
9 | HU Robert J. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
10 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 10% |
11 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
12 | FENG Du | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
13 | GANESAN Mathavan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
14 | ZHAI Avalo | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
15 | XIAO Hanzhi (Shawn) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
16 | HU Anton | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
17 | FANG Hanning | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
18 | ZHAO Zidong | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
19 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
19 | LIU Adam | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
21 | MEN Junda | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
22 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
23 | ZHANG ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
24 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
25 | WONG King-Yee | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | LI Zachary | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
27 | JIANG Matthew | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
28 | YAO Bowen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
29 | FENG Shang | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
30 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 2% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | CAO Ray | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | SONG Troy | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
33 | KARIMOV Amir | 4% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
34 | CHOU Benson | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | ZHANG Roland | 13% | 32% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | GOON Tristan Yang | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
37 | PAN Tristan | - | 2% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 8% |
38 | KWON Aaron | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | HIGGASON Hugh | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
40 | HO Ivan | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | GLUSHKOV David | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | LI Jaden | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.