New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 2 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 3 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 5 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 6 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 7 | BAI Austin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 8 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 9 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 10 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 11 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
| 13 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 14 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 7% | - | |
| 16 | SIU Max | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 18 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 21 | XIAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% |
| 22 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 25 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | LIU Gene | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 28 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
| 30 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 31 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 34 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 35 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 36 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 37 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | HARRY Landen | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 46 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% | |
| 47 | HARRY Ryan | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Zijie | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | XU Lucas | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 53 | MANDELBAUM Oliver | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 54 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CHOI Jaeden | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 97% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 57 | SCHENSUL Lukas | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.