Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 2 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 3 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 5% |
| 3 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 5 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 6 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 7 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 8 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 9 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 10 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
| 11 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 12 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 14 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 15 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% |
| 16 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 5% |
| 19 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 5% |
| 20 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 97% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 24 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 26 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 28 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 33 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% |
| 35 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 36 | BAKER Ethan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 41 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 99% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WONG Evan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 95% | 66% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | CAJERO Luis | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 49 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 52 | KIM Kevin | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | PARK David | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PARK William | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SHORTER David Alexander | 100% | 70% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | DEJOURNETT Jacob | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 61 | LI Gen | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.