Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V D V D D | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
| 3 | ZHANG Daniel D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 5 | HOLMES Stuart S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | LI Eric | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 7 | KNIZHNIK David | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 8 | LI Arvin | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 9 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 11 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | KAO Castor T. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 13 | ZOBEL Eric H. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 14 | WU Alexander | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 15 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | GONG Benjamin | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 17 | ADLER David R. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 18 | HOOSHI JAYDEN C. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 20 | SHA Yi Peng | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 21 | HOOSHI DYLAN M. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 22 | SONG Noel | V D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 23 | LIU Derek | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 24 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 25 | JIANG Owen | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 26 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 27 | WELCH Kyle J. | D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 28 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 29 | HE Xiangrui | V D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 30 | GUPTA Varun | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 31 | ACHILOV Sayid | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 32 | MIALL Steven A. | D D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 33 | LIN Michael | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 34 | LIN James G. | V V V D V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 35 | XIAO Bowen | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 36 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 37 | JI Aidan Y. | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 38 | SHIN Joshua J. | D V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 39 | JACOVINO Jonathan S. | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 40 | LI Ayren | V D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 41 | LIGH Thomas | V D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 42 | SHAO Eric | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 43 | BING Charles | D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 44 | WANG Mason | V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 45 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 46 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 47 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 48 | BARTRAM Carter H. | V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 49 | TSAI Max W. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 50 | TEMPLE Jackson | D V D V V D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 51 | CHOI Mason | V D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 52 | XU Ethan | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 53 | GAO William | D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 54 | PITERBARG Maxim | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 55 | AMRANI David | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 56 | CHREKY Jacob D. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 56 | ZHENG Harrison | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 58 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 59 | GARDINER Luke J. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 60 | BOUSSY Luciano | D V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 61 | FENG Michael | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 62 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 63 | SURESH Rohan | D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 64 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 65 | CHENG Ethan | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 65 | MCQUIDE Elliot | D D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 67 | YANG Dylan | V V D D D V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 68 | CHUA Kirby | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 69 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 70 | BALDWIN Benjamin | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 71 | CURTIS William K. | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 72 | WILBERT Matt | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 73 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 74 | LAO Kevin | D D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 75 | LI Aaron | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 76 | WANG Rory | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 77 | GE Daniel | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 78 | HO Jor Sam | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 79 | WOHLERS Casey | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 80 | KONG Luculentus X. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 81 | WOHLERS Trevor | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 82 | CUTLER Andrew | D D D V D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 83 | TANG Albert | V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
| 84 | ARRISON Alexandrew C. | V D D D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 85 | YEE Michael | D D V D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
| 86 | SHAMBARGER Graham | V D D D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 87 | WILSON Samuel S. | D D V D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
| 88 | BISHOP Henry | D D D V D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 89 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | D D V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 90 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D V D D D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
| 91 | HORAK Peter C. | D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 92 | TAM Kyle | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 93 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
| 94 | DENG Kenny | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 95 | VO Jonathan | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 96 | COFFIN Carleton | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 97 | HARRIS Noah | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
| 97 | HOWARD Fox | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 99 | BERETICH Brian | D D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 100 | ANDERSON Maxwell | D D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.