Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V D V D D | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
3 | ZHANG Daniel D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
3 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
5 | HOLMES Stuart S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | LI Eric | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
7 | KNIZHNIK David | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
8 | LI Arvin | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
9 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
11 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
12 | KAO Castor T. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
13 | ZOBEL Eric H. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
14 | WU Alexander | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
15 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | GONG Benjamin | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
17 | ADLER David R. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | HOOSHI JAYDEN C. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
20 | SHA Yi Peng | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
21 | HOOSHI DYLAN M. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
22 | SONG Noel | V D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
23 | LIU Derek | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
24 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | JIANG Owen | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
26 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
27 | WELCH Kyle J. | D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
28 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
29 | HE Xiangrui | V D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
30 | GUPTA Varun | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
31 | ACHILOV Sayid | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
32 | MIALL Steven A. | D D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
33 | LIN Michael | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
34 | LIN James G. | V V V D V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | XIAO Bowen | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
36 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
37 | JI Aidan Y. | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
38 | SHIN Joshua J. | D V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
39 | JACOVINO Jonathan S. | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
40 | LI Ayren | V D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
41 | LIGH Thomas | V D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
42 | SHAO Eric | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
43 | BING Charles | D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
44 | WANG Mason | V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
47 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
48 | BARTRAM Carter H. | V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
49 | TSAI Max W. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
50 | TEMPLE Jackson | D V D V V D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
51 | CHOI Mason | V D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
52 | XU Ethan | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
53 | GAO William | D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
54 | PITERBARG Maxim | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
55 | AMRANI David | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
56 | CHREKY Jacob D. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
56 | ZHENG Harrison | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
58 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
59 | GARDINER Luke J. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
60 | BOUSSY Luciano | D V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
61 | FENG Michael | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
62 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
63 | SURESH Rohan | D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
64 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
65 | CHENG Ethan | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
65 | MCQUIDE Elliot | D D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
67 | YANG Dylan | V V D D D V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
68 | CHUA Kirby | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
69 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
70 | BALDWIN Benjamin | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
71 | CURTIS William K. | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
72 | WILBERT Matt | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
73 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
74 | LAO Kevin | D D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
75 | LI Aaron | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
76 | WANG Rory | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
77 | GE Daniel | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
78 | HO Jor Sam | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
79 | WOHLERS Casey | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
80 | KONG Luculentus X. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
81 | WOHLERS Trevor | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
82 | CUTLER Andrew | D D D V D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
83 | TANG Albert | V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
84 | ARRISON Alexandrew C. | V D D D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
85 | YEE Michael | D D V D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
86 | SHAMBARGER Graham | V D D D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
87 | WILSON Samuel S. | D D V D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
88 | BISHOP Henry | D D D V D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
89 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | D D V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
90 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D V D D D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
91 | HORAK Peter C. | D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
92 | TAM Kyle | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
93 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
94 | DENG Kenny | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
95 | VO Jonathan | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
96 | COFFIN Carleton | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
97 | HARRIS Noah | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
97 | HOWARD Fox | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
99 | BERETICH Brian | D D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
100 | ANDERSON Maxwell | D D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.