Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
2 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | < 1% |
3 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
3 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
5 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
6 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
7 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
8 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
9 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
10 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
11 | OLSEN Jen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
12 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | |
13 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
14 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
15 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
16 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
17 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
18 | LAO Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
19 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
20 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 100% | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
20 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
22 | COKER Bettina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
23 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
24 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
25 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
26 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
27 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
28 | DEBLAERE Caecie M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
29 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
30 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
31 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% |
32 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
33 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
34 | BORGES Valeryn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
35 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
36 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
37 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
38 | JOHNSON Shelby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
39 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
39 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
41 | HAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
42 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
43 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
44 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
44 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
46 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
47 | BABER Eshaal | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
48 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
49 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
50 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
50 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
52 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
53 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
54 | LIU Long | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
55 | YUEN Elsie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
56 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
57 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
58 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
59 | MUHAMMAD Auset | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
60 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
61 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
62 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
63 | HWANG Chanel | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
65 | KIM Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
66 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
67 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
68 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
69 | LI Katerina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
70 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
71 | PARK Leah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
72 | NEUMAN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
73 | LI Grace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
74 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
75 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
76 | RICHARDS Ella | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
77 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
78 | BRODERICK Kylin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
79 | WISEMAN Margaret (Daisy) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
80 | LAYE Isabella | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
81 | YIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
82 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
83 | LIU Jessica | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
84 | SHTEPA Rada | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
85 | COELHO Sofia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
86 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
87 | LIU Grace | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
88 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
90 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
91 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
92 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
92 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
94 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
95 | COX Sophia | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
96 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
97 | MIZIN Sarita O. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
98 | ISHANOVA Sofia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - |
99 | JANEW Anastasia | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
100 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
101 | WU Velyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
101 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
103 | BRUSH Sydney | 100% | 96% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
103 | GADIYARAM Sushama | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
105 | MARRINAN Eva | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
106 | POWLEDGE Cora | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
107 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
108 | KUNIHIRO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
109 | DESAI Kanushi | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
110 | BALCE Cyril | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
111 | REESE Rebecca M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
112 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
113 | LIU Emily | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
114 | LOVE Brianna | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
115 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
116 | BABB Cicely | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
117 | TREADWAY Ella | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
118 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
119 | HAMMER anya | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
120 | CANO Sofia | 100% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
121 | JOHNSON Maya | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
122 | SEN Arjen | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
123 | BIENSTOCK Alexis | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
124 | SAUCEDO Fernanda | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
125 | TOMASI Samantha | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
126 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
126 | MAHABALESHWARKAR Aanika | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
128 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
129 | NIRGUDE Esha | 100% | 98% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
130 | CHANG Janelle | 100% | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
131 | ZHAO Aimee | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
132 | PARA Akshaya | 100% | 80% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
134 | TENZIN Kyijong | 100% | 82% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
135 | SOHN Juniper | 100% | 76% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
136 | CHENG Emma | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
137 | COLLINS Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
138 | ZHANG Tingyun (Linda) | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
139 | ZANDER Maxx | 100% | 99% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
140 | SINGH Sania | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
141 | STONE Colleen R. | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
142 | MILES Quinn | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
143 | LAU Elena | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
144 | DURR Strahlia Devi | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
145 | UNGLAUB Emma | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
146 | KAPLAN Carly | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
146 | ROBINSON Ashley | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
148 | WANG Kelsey | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
149 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
149 | CONVERSO Antonella | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
149 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
149 | LAW Casey | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
153 | PRESTWICH Paula J. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
153 | WILLIAMS Olivia | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
153 | LIAO Jiarou | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
153 | MISHRA Oorja | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.