Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 2 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 61% |
| 3 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% |
| 4 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 29% |
| 5 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 6 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% |
| 7 | GULA Maksym | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 8 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% |
| 9 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% |
| 10 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 12 | YAVOROVSKIY Joshua I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 18% |
| 13 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 15 | ARTYSHEVSKYY Olexa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 16 | ATKINS Levi | 100% | 99% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 17 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | VISSER Zeb | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 4% |
| 19 | YU Austin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 4% | - |
| 20 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | KUKHAREV Vladimir | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
| 23 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 25 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 100% | 84% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
| 26 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | MALIKOV Zinnun | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 2% | - |
| 29 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | TANG Charles | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | LARAGY Collin | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | URBAN Leo | 100% | 14% | - | - | - | - |
| 34 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | EVANS George | 100% | 92% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | PEDICONE Joseph | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.