Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PETROLL Jared P. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 40% | 55% |
| 2 | WICKBOLDT Eric | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 3 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 63% |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 5 | CLAES Thomas | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 12% | 3% | < 1% |
| 6 | SITTER Gregoire | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 1% |
| 7 | CANNAERT Ethan | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 8 | SIM Ian | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 9 | WONG Ethan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | < 1% |
| 10 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | < 1% |
| 11 | KONG Martin C. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | KENNY Oliver R. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 2% |
| 13 | LI Ethan R. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | COHEN Benjamin A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 15 | NG Biwon | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 16 | WONG Preston | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | HELGE James R. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 19 | PERALTA Christian | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 37% | 4% | |
| 20 | LIPTON Michael D. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | SODHI Jaco | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 22 | CLAES Lucas | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | CHANG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | MANA Arnav | - | 5% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | GUO Woody | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 26 | CHHAJED Vaibhav | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHIEM Karen | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KUO Michael | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 29 | PRAKASH Hari | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | STOREY Liam | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LAURIMAA Emil | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | DUONG John | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | PERALTA Christian | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 34 | QIAO James | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KATTAN Michel | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | ZHANG Rose | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | PATTERSON Liliya | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | ASTLE Stephen | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BUJANOVER Maayan | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | LIN Jason | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.