Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 2 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 3 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 3 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 5 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 6 | DZHUS Yurii | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 7 | PONS Diego | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 9 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 10 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 11 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 12 | KIM John J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 18% |
| 14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 15 | PARK Sky | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | FOO Raynol | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | WU Alistair | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 20 | LI Toby | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 21 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 11% |
| 23 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 24 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 28 | DEANS Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 29 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 30 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 32 | LIPPMAN Sam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 34 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 36 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 40 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 41 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 73% | 26% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 93% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 44 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 45 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 46 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 48 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 50 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 51 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 92% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% |
| 55 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 56 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 62 | FANHAIJI Musitafa | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 63 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 64 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 65 | HSIAO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 67 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 68 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 69 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 70 | SAH Steven | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 71 | CAJERO Luis O. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 72 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 73 | MORTON Joshua | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 75 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 76 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 79 | WONG Evan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | ANWEILER Nathan | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | PARK Brandon | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | JIANG Yehong | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 87 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 62% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | BLAM Matthew | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | LUI Justin | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.