Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOOMRE Kai | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
2 | BAI Austin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
3 | LI Bradley | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 75% |
3 | ZHAO Nathan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
5 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 40% | 38% |
6 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
7 | LI Edison M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
8 | ZHANG Gavin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
9 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
10 | KO Caleb | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
11 | MO Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
12 | WANG Luke | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
13 | HOU Gaven | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
14 | TANG Royce | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
15 | XIE Jayden | - | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
16 | SHAW eric | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
17 | HE Ryan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
18 | HUANG Jinyao | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
19 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
20 | LIU Alex | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
21 | REN Ryan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
22 | ZHANG Ethan | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
23 | XU Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
24 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
25 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
26 | ZHAI Alex | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
27 | ZHUANG Disheng E. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
28 | PAN Howard Haoran | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
29 | LU Jingyi | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% |
30 | JIN Andy | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
31 | CHEN kenneth | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
32 | FONG Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
33 | LU Hansen | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
34 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
35 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
36 | SIU Max | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
37 | KIAYIAS Anthony | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
38 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
39 | LI Jayden | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | WANG Ancen | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
41 | NG Kai | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | ZHAI Derrick | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
43 | QIAN Zekai | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
44 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
45 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
46 | ZHENG Austin | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
47 | HU Daniel | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
48 | WANG Mendy | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
49 | KAYE Ben | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | SINGH Jai Anand | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | SU Aiden | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | HU Michael | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
53 | MAZAHERI John | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
55 | WU Rayson siyu | 1% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
56 | KUBBA Krish | 17% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
57 | WEI JR Shan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
58 | TSENG Lucas | 20% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
59 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
60 | HARDWICK Alex | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | CHAU Ivan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
62 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
63 | LIN Joshua | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | CHEN Kyler | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
65 | RYNKOWSKI Ryno | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
66 | ZHAO David | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
67 | HOO Bezalel | 2% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
68 | PECHOTA Augustus | 43% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.