French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BUELAU Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 24% |
| 3 | WEISS Miles J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 3 | GUINAN Joseph | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 5 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 6 | LANGE Henry C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 7 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
| 8 | KOKENGE Clark | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | RODNEY Maxwell | - | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 10 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 6% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | NDJEKA Jesse | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 12 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% |
| 13 | VELINOV Gabriel | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Wesley | - | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LI Jesse | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 16 | JONES Reilly | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | VELTRUP Paul | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 18 | MOHOV Aleksey | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | RITTER Clayton | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | MARSHALL John W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 22 | RIGGINS Joshua | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% |
| 25 | ARNEMANN Jonas | 15% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | SOMIR Avinash V. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SVIRINOVSKYI Illia | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 29 | KUMAR Anitya | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 8% |
| 30 | KRUGOV Yuriy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 31 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | TRAUGER Tyson | 3% | 27% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WU Jimmy | 7% | 45% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | KEMNITZER John | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FENNELL William | 34% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | BLAKE Carson | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SON Eric | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | CHEN Jerry | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | THAKARE Kaustubh | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHI Vincent | 10% | 42% | 43% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.