French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BUELAU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
3 | WEISS Miles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
3 | GUINAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
5 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
6 | LANGE Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
7 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% | |
8 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
9 | RODNEY Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% |
10 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
11 | NDJEKA Jesse | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
12 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 4% |
13 | VELINOV Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
14 | LEE Wesley | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
15 | LI Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
16 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
17 | VELTRUP Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
18 | MOHOV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
19 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
20 | RITTER Clayton | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
21 | MARSHALL John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
22 | RIGGINS Joshua | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
24 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 3% |
25 | ARNEMANN Jonas | 100% | 85% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
26 | SOMIR Avinash V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
27 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | SVIRINOVSKYI Illia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 8% |
30 | KRUGOV Yuriy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
31 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
32 | TRAUGER Tyson | 100% | 97% | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
33 | WU Jimmy | 100% | 93% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
34 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
35 | KEMNITZER John | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
36 | FENNELL William | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | BLAKE Carson | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | SON Eric | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
39 | CHEN Jerry | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
40 | THAKARE Kaustubh | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | ZHI Vincent | 100% | 90% | 48% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.