Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAN kevin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 2 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 3 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 5 | KIAYIAS Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | CHANG Parker | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | SHOU Raymond | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 8 | CHAE Emmett | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 10 | GUGALA Frank | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | LIU Gene | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 12 | SIU Max | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 13 | HUANG Dalynn | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | SHARMA Ari | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | HU Michael | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHONG Cooper | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 17 | ZHAI Derrick | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 18 | XIA Vincent | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 19 | ZHAO David | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZHONG Kingsley | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | HUYNH Kaleb | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 22 | YANG Luca | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 23 | CAO Aaron | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | PAN Jason | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 25 | LIN Ziyue | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 26 | HAN Jiaren | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | SPEZAKIS Achilles | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | HONG Thomas | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WONG Blayke | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | TIAN Andy | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 31 | ZHONG Albert | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Grant | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 33 | YANG Crescent | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | FANG Lionel | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | ZHANG Eric | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | MARTIRE Francis | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ARNOULD Frederick | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | SOBKOWIAK Dylan | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | LIU Brady | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MOORE Cooper | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.