Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 2 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 5 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 6 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 8 | CHAE Emmett | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
| 10 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | LIU Gene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
| 12 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 13 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | HU Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 17 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 18 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 19 | ZHAO David | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 22 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 23 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | PAN Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 25 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 26 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | SPEZAKIS Achilles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | HONG Thomas | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WONG Blayke | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 31 | ZHONG Albert | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Grant | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | YANG Crescent | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | MARTIRE Francis | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ARNOULD Frederick | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | SOBKOWIAK Dylan | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | LIU Brady | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MOORE Cooper | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.