Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHENG Andy | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | GARRETT Samuel | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
3 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
5 | MICKO Fritz K. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
6 | SERAFYM Damian | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
7 | LOISEAU Eliott | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
8 | SPINA Joseph B. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
9 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
10 | LI Chenyu | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
11 | DHAL Leon | V V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
12 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
13 | NGUYEN Tate | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
14 | VEZMAR Evan H. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
15 | SILVERS Ari | D V V V V D | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
16 | KRZYSIAK David F. | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
17 | MCKEEVER Luca | V V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
18 | JONES Reilly | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
19 | AGARWAL Adheesh | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | MCDOWELL Will | V V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
21 | CURTY Jack | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
21 | FU Jason | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
23 | YANG Zeke | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
24 | DENNIS Ethan | D V D V D V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
25 | JIANG Matthew | V D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
26 | MISHRA Milan B. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | ELYADERANI Paxon | D D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
28 | GRAVES Lawson | V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
29 | MITEV Alexander | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
30 | FRANGER Max | D D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
31 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | V D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
32 | WILLIAMS Logan | D D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
33 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | V V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
34 | GINZBURG Adam | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
35 | BARFORD Giovanni | D V V D D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
36 | ZHENG Jerry | D D D D V V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
37 | BRADFORD Ethan | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
38 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | D V D D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
39 | BORUCKI Grant | D V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
40 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | V V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
41 | RIECK Brennan | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
42 | TIMEK Jan | D V D V D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
43 | MALEADY Sean | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
44 | KARAMAGA Ganza | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
45 | MOHAMED Sabir | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
46 | PETROVICH Alexandar | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
47 | STOKER Elliott | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
48 | SAHA Sayan | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
49 | GROOTHUIS David | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
50 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
51 | FELICIANO Damien | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
52 | VANOYEN Dominick | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
53 | COHEN Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
54 | PATEL Aayan | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.