Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NGUYEN Tate | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
2 | BORISENKO Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
3 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
3 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
5 | ZHENG Jerry | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
6 | DHAL Leon | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
7 | PETROVICH Alexandar | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
8 | ZIEGLER John | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
9 | MITEV Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
10 | GRAVES Lawson | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
11 | FU Jason | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
12 | VANOYEN Dominick | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
13 | NOTT Kobi | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
14 | JOBE Connor | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
15 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
16 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
17 | MCDOWELL Will | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
18 | FRANGER Max | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
19 | CHIN Dylan A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 24% |
20 | GINZBURG Adam | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
21 | COLEMAN Ian | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
22 | ELLEDGE Vade | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
23 | KRZYSIAK David F. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
23 | JONES Reilly | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
25 | TIMEK Jan | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
26 | BARFORD Giovanni | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
27 | HUANG Kenneth | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
28 | THOMPSON North D. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
29 | STOKER Elliott | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
30 | WILLIAMS Logan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | SHAFFER Tyler | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
32 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
33 | CHEN Bowen | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | MISHRA Milan B. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
35 | JIANG Matthew | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
36 | PATEL Aayan | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
37 | ZHANG Michael | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
38 | EICHORN Frederick | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | LEHNER Brian | 43% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | LIM-SEIWERT Armand | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
41 | COHEN Henry | 13% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
42 | ZHANG James | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.