Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Tate | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | BORISENKO Samuel | D D D V V V | V V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 3 | SPINA Joseph B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | LOISEAU Eliott | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 5 | ZHENG Jerry | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 6 | DHAL Leon | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 7 | PETROVICH Alexandar | V V D V D D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 8 | ZIEGLER John | D D D V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 9 | MITEV Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 10 | GRAVES Lawson | V V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | FU Jason | D V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 12 | VANOYEN Dominick | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | NOTT Kobi | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | JOBE Connor | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | V V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | MCDOWELL Will | D V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | FRANGER Max | D D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | CHIN Dylan A. | V D V V D V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 | |
| 20 | GINZBURG Adam | D V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | COLEMAN Ian | V D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | ELLEDGE Vade | V V D D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | KRZYSIAK David F. | V D V V D D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 23 | JONES Reilly | D D D V V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | TIMEK Jan | D V V D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 26 | BARFORD Giovanni | D V D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 27 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | THOMPSON North D. | D D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | STOKER Elliott | D V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Logan | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 31 | SHAFFER Tyler | D D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | D D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 33 | CHEN Bowen | V V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | MISHRA Milan B. | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | JIANG Matthew | V D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | PATEL Aayan | V D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 37 | ZHANG Michael | D D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 38 | EICHORN Frederick | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 39 | LEHNER Brian | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | LIM-SEIWERT Armand | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 41 | COHEN Henry | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | ZHANG James | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.