USC PE Building (PED) North Gym - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YOO Justin H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 25% | |
| 2 | SHIFRON Daniel A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 3 | LEE Aaron Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 5 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 6 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 7 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 3% | |
| 8 | HESSLEGRAVE Porter B. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 9 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 10 | ZHOU Alan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 11 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
| 12 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 10% | |
| 13 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 4% | |
| 14 | BURTON Patrick | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 15 | DEMPSEY Connor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Cuong T. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | GORY Andrea H. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 18 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 20 | PENNER Kyle D. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | LEE Richard U. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 23 | UJITA Andrew K. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 24 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 26 | AHN Gus | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | ARGYRIS Michael A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | NACHTRIEB Quinn | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 29 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 87% | 43% | 9% | - | |
| 30 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 32 | NORTON Brendan E. | 100% | 83% | 37% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 16% | 1% | |
| 36 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 37 | MACLEAN Greyson | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 38 | GAURIAT Olivier | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
| 39 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 40 | GRIFFEN Emily P. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 41 | REED Henry | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 42 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 43 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 44 | KUIKEN Matthew T. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 44 | YASAR Mustafa H. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 44 | WANG Kevin | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.