Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
2 | HU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
3 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 1% |
3 | SHAN Junzhe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
5 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
6 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
7 | RUBIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
8 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% |
9 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
10 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
11 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 34% | |
12 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
13 | YUE Hongrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
14 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
15 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
16 | LIU Josh | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
17 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
18 | HAMZA Tudor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% |
19 | DECKER Hunter | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
20 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
21 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
22 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
23 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
24 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
25 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
26 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 40% | |
27 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
28 | BUI Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
29 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
30 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
31 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | |
32 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
33 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
34 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
35 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
36 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | ||
37 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
38 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
39 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
40 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
41 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
42 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 8% |
43 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
44 | SOOS Whitman | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
46 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
47 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
48 | LI Tristan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
48 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
50 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
51 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
52 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | ||
53 | HE Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
54 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
55 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | - |
56 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
57 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
59 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
60 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | LIU Bryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
62 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
63 | KIM Julian | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
64 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
65 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
66 | LI zerong | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
67 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
68 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
69 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
70 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
70 | WONG Baron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
72 | REAGAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
73 | GUO Woody | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
74 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
75 | SUN Neo | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
76 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
77 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
78 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
79 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
80 | SUMA Marvin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
81 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
82 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
83 | LIU Zicheng | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | |
84 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 14% | 1% | |
85 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
86 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
87 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
88 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
89 | CARTY JR Johndale | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
90 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
91 | KIM Remington | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
91 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
93 | KUANG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
94 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
94 | GOWDA Suyog | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
96 | SHILOV Maxim | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
97 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
98 | YALAMANCHILI Anvith | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | - |
99 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 96% | 68% | 24% | 3% | ||
100 | YILMAZ Tarik | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 1% | ||
101 | SHERLOCK Roderick | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
102 | GREENMAN Duke | 100% | 73% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
103 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
104 | SHAFFER Tyler | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
105 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
106 | NAEMI Barsam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
107 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
108 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
109 | WANG Devin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
110 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
110 | ABAD Mateo | 100% | 76% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
112 | MIZRACHI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
113 | YUE Bryan | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
114 | LI Timothy | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
114 | CAMPOS Sebastian | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
116 | POHL Philip | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
117 | JIANG Aaron | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
118 | LU Haoyang | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
119 | CHO Sean | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
120 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
121 | SATHYAN Dev | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
122 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
122 | HUANG Ethan | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
122 | MIZRACHI Moisés | 100% | 95% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
125 | QIU William | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
126 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
127 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
128 | PLUMMER Kellan | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.