Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Leonardo | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 2 | WANG justin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | |
| 3 | LEE JoonWon | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | MEGGERS Davin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 5 | SETO Jing | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 6 | HU Robert J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 7 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 24% |
| 8 | WONG King-Yee | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 11 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 13 | GINZBURG Adam | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 15 | SHA Michael | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 16 | NAKAS Levent | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 17 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
| 18 | XIA Dashan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 19 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 19 | CHEMEZOV Trent | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 42% | 15% |
| 21 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 22 | SINGH Jaysukh | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 23 | ZHANG Roland | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | NAEMI Barsam | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Colin | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 26 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 27 | MEN Junda | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 28 | CAO Ray | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Jayden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 6% |
| 31 | LEE Aiden | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | YANG Gary | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 34 | TSE Maxwell | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 35 | MIDYANY Evan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 36 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 37 | KARIMOV Amir | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 38 | ALABI Tobi | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 39 | LIU Yueri | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 40 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 41 | REPIC Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 42 | YU Samuel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | DONG Haiyi | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 44 | GANESAN Mathavan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 45 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 46 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | ZHAO Pierce | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | CHOU Benson | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | CHA Patrick | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | AHMED Mohsen | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LI Jade | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Ethan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 53 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | ZHANG Albert | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 55 | LIU Adam | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 56 | ANAFI Ari | 10% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 58 | ZHAO Kuncheng | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 59 | SEOW Daniel | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 60 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 61 | SONG Changze | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SUN Ethan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | KIM Samuel | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | SONG Troy | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 66 | HUANG Kenneth | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 67 | WONG Maximus | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 68 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 69 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 70 | CAMP Ethan | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | CHEN Edward | 12% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | KIM Henry | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 73 | RIM Eugene | 1% | 9% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 74 | NILSEN Mark | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | GLUSHKOV David | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | LIU Zicheng | 4% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | PAN Anthony | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | OCONNOR Paul | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 81 | ANDAZ Cyrus | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 82 | DOAN Christopher | 39% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 82 | LI Ray | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 84 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 85 | TESFAYE Elias | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | CHO Henry | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 87 | NUTOVYCH David | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 88 | NAM Nathaniel | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | RVACHEV Michael | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 91 | JIANG Aaron | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 92 | LEE Wyatt | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | PTASZEK Al | 29% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | URBAN Leo | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | CHAN Ryan | 53% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | LEE Henry | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 97 | YI Nathan | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 98 | BARATY Teagan | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 99 | KAPLAN Maddox | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | TSANG Aiden | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.