Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 2 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 3 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 34% |
| 5 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 6 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 7 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 8 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 9 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 11 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | |
| 12 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 13 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 14 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% | |
| 17 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
| 18 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | LIN George | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 22 | DANTON Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 3% | |
| 23 | CHEN Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 24 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
| 25 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 26 | ZHAO David | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 28 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 29 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 31 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | JI Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 34 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 35 | PAN Jason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 36 | WU Silin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 37 | HU Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 38 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 41 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 43 | WU Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
| 44 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 46 | CASCONE Raffaele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% |
| 47 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | WANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 50 | YUNG Zak | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | WANG George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% | |
| 52 | LIU Brady | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | WONG Blayke | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 54 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 55 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SINGH Jai Anand | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | LIU Gene | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LIU Mason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 61 | WANG Jaren | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 62 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | MENG Andy | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | HUA Isaac | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 67 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 68 | LI Andrew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 69 | JI Ethan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | SHUM Wesley | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | GAO Wesley | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 72 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 75 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 76 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | YANG Luca | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | MARTIRE Francis | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 80 | CHEN Dante | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 81 | MENZEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 82 | YU Ethan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | WU Connor | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | RICHMAN Aaron | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | KUTATELADZE Danieli | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | CHONG Luke | 100% | 99% | 78% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 88 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 89 | MARTINSON Finn | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 90 | XU Jason | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | WU Gengze | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 92 | YANG Crescent | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.