The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 3 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | |
| 5 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 6 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
| 7 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 8 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 9 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 10 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
| 11 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 12 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 13 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 14 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% | |
| 15 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 16 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 17 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |
| 18 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 19 | WONG Preston | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 22 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 14% | |
| 23 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | COLLINS Kaden | 100% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 28 | MA Ryan | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | GUO Woody | 100% | 99% | 87% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | DENG Andes | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WANG Devin | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | LI Sean | 100% | 73% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | LIN Andrew | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | MITCHEM Paolo | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.