The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
Maria Panyi (1), Andrey Geva (2), Igor Chirashnya (3), and Sue Moheb (4).

Take Action

2023 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Y-14 Men's Épée

Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 12:30 PM

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ELHUSSEINI Dylan V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 KIM Teddy V V V V D D V V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
3 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 MULDOON Thomas V D V V D V V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
5 GINZBURG Adam V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
6 MORIN-JIANG Jake V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
7 MEHROTRA Neel V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
8 ELHUSSEINI Kyle V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
9 KIM Jayden V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
10 LI zerong V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
11 SAUNIER Cameron V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
12 TAI Edison V V D V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
13 AHMED Mohsen V V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
14 SINGLETON Aman V V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
15 PARKER Isaiah D V V D V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
16 WONG Baron V D V V D D V V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
17 BORISENKO Samuel V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
17 DECKER Hunter V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
19 ROSADO Balthazar Francisco V V V V V V V D 3.3 6 +2.7
20 QIAN Irvine V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
21 TESFAYE Elias V V V D V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
22 HERNDON Liam V V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
23 DOUBOV Andrew V V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
24 SOOS Whitman V V V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
25 ARMSTRONG TyLee V V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
26 GOROZA Eric D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
27 LI Tristan V V V D D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
28 ZHAI Junqi V V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
29 LEE Aiden V V V D V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
30 PAN Anthony V V D D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
31 GREENMAN Duke V D D V V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
32 YAO Tristan V V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
33 LIOZNYANSKY Miron V V V V D V D 4.3 5 +0.7
34 MOORE Alexander V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
35 CHANG Matthew D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
36 KIM Alexander V D V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
37 SUN Ethan V V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
38 VEERAVALLI Vivek V D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
39 OLSON Joseph V V D V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
40 GACIOCH Noah V V V V D D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
41 VAN RIET Stefan D V V V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
42 JAO Aaron V D D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
43 MAZAHERI Fletcher D D V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
44 BARFORD Giovanni V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
45 HUANG Yidong Allen V V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
46 LU Haoyang V D V D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
47 NGUYEN Khanh D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
48 SU Samuel D V V D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
49 WANG Devin V D V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
50 FU Adrian D D V V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
51 PEREZ Daniel V V D D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
52 ARMSTRONG Payson D V D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
53 KOSTUSIAK Evan D V D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 CHO Sean D V D V D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
55 WU Johnny y. D V D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
56 YAKHNIS Seth D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
57 LUO Alexander V V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
58 DENG haoyu D D V D V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
59 DADE Augustus D V V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
60 YILMAZ Tarik D V D V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
61 MAXU Tiger D D D D V V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
62 CAFASSO Alexander D D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
63 MA Ciel D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
64 SATHYAN Dev D D D V D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
65 DU Evan V D V V V D D 3.0 4 +1.0
66 SUMA Marvin V V D V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
67 HUANG Ethan D V D V V D 0.7 3 +2.3
68 MANGAN Hunter D V D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
69 KUANG Bryan D V V V D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
70 KIM Remington V V V D D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
71 FENG Xinmin V D D V D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
72 MENG Haoyi V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
73 LIU Austin D D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
74 GRIGORENKO Gleb E. V V V D D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
75 ZHAI Christopher D D V V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
76 SHAFFER Tyler D D D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
77 WALKER Mclain D D D D V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
78 GOODMAN Benjamin D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
79 LEE Daniel D V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
80 GOODMAN Liam D V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
81 NAM Nathaniel D V D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
82 MASOR MAX V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
82 HURLEY Michael D D D V V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
84 XUE Kevin D D D V D V D 0.7 2 +1.3
85 MODI Rohan D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
86 HANTOV Adrian D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
86 NEWSOM Finn D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
88 CAMPOS Sebastian D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
89 GONIMA Francisco D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
90 WONG Alexander V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
90 WANG Lucas D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
92 LEWIS Michael D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
93 PLUMMER Kellan V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
94 VEERAVALLI Pranav D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
95 KIM Julian D V D D D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
96 KHERSONSKY Robert D D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
97 KICIMAN Leo D D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
97 MILLER Xavier D D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
99 CHEN Aiden D D D V D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
100 XUE Michael V D D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
101 WANG Jiacheng D D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
102 LIU Max D D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
103 SOLOMON Aryeh D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
103 KIM Alexander D V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
105 YUE Bryan D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
106 WU Nathan D V D D D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
107 HURT Stone D V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
108 TUMULA Arihaan D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
108 BAO Caton D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
110 KIM Leejay D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
111 LINDERS Jackson D D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
112 LEE Davidson D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
113 REYES Lucas D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.