Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 2 | MITCHUM Drew J | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | PARK Ian C. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 | REICHBACH Solomon | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 5 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 6 | TRAN Dai Long | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 7 | LIU John | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 8 | MARKAS Justin W. | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 10 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | |
| 11 | KIM Edward J. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% | |
| 13 | CHAWLA Armaan | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 14 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | MANZ Hamilton R. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | BOSWELL Griffin H. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | WU Byron | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | LEE Shwan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | LU Sebastian X. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 20 | ADLER Ethan M. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | RAWSON Nicholas | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 22 | ZHANG Andrew | 3% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | BAGHA Armin | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 24 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 25 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 26 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | BORAK Samuel | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | FU Ethan | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 6% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BLUM Oliver | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | MISHIMA Torata | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | CHOU Ryan | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.