Phoenix, AZ - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LA ROSA Federico | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 2 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | XIAO EDWARD | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | WONG Nicholas A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | CHIN Julian S. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 9 | ZHANG Luke T. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | BURKE Spencer W. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 12 | VAZQUEZ Zander | V V V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 13 | DANKAR Neel | V V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | OH Jonathan | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 15 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 16 | AIBEL Hudson J. | D D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | MILLER Duncan R. | V V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 19 | DIERKS Kian | V D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | LEE David Y. | V D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | WONG Antonio | V V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | KIM Jackson | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | V V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | V D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | BAO Aaron | V D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | LE Jacob W. | D D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 28 | KHER Roan | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 29 | WOO Christian | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 30 | PAI Lakshan K. | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 31 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | KIM Banseok | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | CHEN Kyle P. | V D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 34 | NGUYEN Liam | D D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 35 | CHUANG Kian J. | D V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 36 | WECHSLER Jacob | D V V D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 37 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 38 | NAM Michael | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | WANG Ethan | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 40 | CHOI Isaac | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | TSAO Lukas | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 42 | OH Jaden | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | SPINA Joseph B. | D V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 44 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 45 | LLIDO Soren | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 47 | KIM Ryan Y. | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | CHANIN Liam R. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 49 | OH Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.