Phoenix, AZ - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LA ROSA Federico | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
2 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
3 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
6 | WONG Nicholas A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
7 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
8 | BRUK Peter J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
9 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
10 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
11 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
12 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
13 | DANKAR Neel | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
14 | OH Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 14% |
15 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
16 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
17 | MILLER Duncan R. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
18 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
19 | DIERKS Kian | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
20 | LEE David Y. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
21 | WONG Antonio | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | KIM Jackson | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
23 | WU Conrad J. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | BAO Aaron | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | LE Jacob W. | 13% | 32% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
28 | KHER Roan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
29 | WOO Christian | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
31 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
32 | KIM Banseok | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | CHEN Kyle P. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
34 | NGUYEN Liam | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
35 | CHUANG Kian J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
36 | WECHSLER Jacob | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | NAM Michael | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
39 | WANG Ethan | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | CHOI Isaac | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
41 | TSAO Lukas | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
42 | OH Jaden | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
43 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
44 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
45 | LLIDO Soren | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | FINNEY Lorenz | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | KIM Ryan Y. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
48 | CHANIN Liam R. | 20% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
49 | OH Joshua | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.