Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MANN JAKEROD | V V V V V V V | V V V V V | 6.2 | 7 | +0.8 |
| 2 | DICKENS Robert W. | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
| 3 | LI Benjamin | V D V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | CHENH Justin | V V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 5 | PARK Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V V V V D V | V V D | 6.5 | 6 | -0.5 |
| 7 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | D V D V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 11 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V V V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 12 | PARK Frederick | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 13 | LAPP Oliver | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | ROBITZSKI David R. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 15 | SEIKEL Spencer | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | BANNEN Nicholas | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | D V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 18 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 19 | PETROW Zoryan | V V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | YI Nathan | D D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | PFEIL Shawn | D V D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | DORASZELSKI Mark | V D V V D V D | D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 23 | LENNON Nicholas | V D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | WATERS Nathaniel | D D V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | CHAWLA Aarav | D D V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | ANAFI Ari | D V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | SOKALSKI Edwin | D D D D V V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 29 | WOOD William A. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | ACKLAND Matthew | D D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | D D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 32 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | CUCCIARRE Pace | V D V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 34 | FAKTOR Emily | V D D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 35 | KRALICEK Emmet | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 36 | HUTZ Michael B. | V D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | MURPHY Megan | V D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 38 | BJERKNESS Riley | D V D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | RITTER Brooklyn | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 40 | SAFKO Liubov V. | D D D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 41 | STANEV POTTS Theodore | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 42 | PARK Patrick | D D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 43 | MADANS David | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 44 | ALLEN Sarah | D D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.