Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | MANN JAKEROD | - | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
2 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
3 | LI Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% | |
3 | CHENH Justin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
5 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 7% | |
6 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 55% |
7 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
8 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
10 | TIKHONOV Daniel | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
11 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
12 | PARK Frederick | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
13 | LAPP Oliver | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
14 | ROBITZSKI David R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
15 | SEIKEL Spencer | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | BANNEN Nicholas | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - | |
17 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
18 | MARTINEZ Joshua | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
19 | PETROW Zoryan | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | YI Nathan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
21 | PFEIL Shawn | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
22 | DORASZELSKI Mark | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
23 | LENNON Nicholas | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - | |
24 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
25 | WATERS Nathaniel | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
26 | CHAWLA Aarav | - | 7% | 47% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
27 | ANAFI Ari | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - | |
28 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
29 | WOOD William A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
30 | ACKLAND Matthew | 1% | 12% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
31 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | 34% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
32 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | CUCCIARRE Pace | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | FAKTOR Emily | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
35 | KRALICEK Emmet | 2% | 17% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
36 | HUTZ Michael B. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
37 | MURPHY Megan | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | BJERKNESS Riley | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
39 | RITTER Brooklyn | 34% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - | |
40 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | STANEV POTTS Theodore | 15% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | PARK Patrick | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | MADANS David | 9% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | ALLEN Sarah | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.