DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 2 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | |
| 3 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 3 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 10% | |
| 5 | DICKENS Robert W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 6 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | |
| 7 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 6% | |
| 8 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | 3% | |
| 9 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 10 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 11 | HULL Liam | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% |
| 13 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 14 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 98% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | SUH David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 18 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
| 19 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 20 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 94% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 31% | |
| 22 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 23 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 24 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 89% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 27 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | GRUPP Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 29 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 10% | |
| 30 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 9% | |
| 32 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 33 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 7% | |
| 34 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 35 | YI Nathan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WRANA Alec C. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 38 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 96% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | EVANS George | 100% | 95% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | SEID Zachary W. | 100% | 92% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | GHAJAR Danial | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | KISH Christina | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.