MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
2 | KRAVIT Connor B. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | KUMAR Anitya | D V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
5 | ZHANG YuJian | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
6 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | GUI Runlin | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
8 | DOLMETSCH Max | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | LIBSON Tazman | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | KOKENGE Clark | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | WU Jason | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
12 | MOTIR Lucas D. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
13 | INSLER Ethan C. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
14 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
15 | MORSE Tyler | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | MUNROE Shane | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
17 | GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle J. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
18 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
19 | WU Joseph | V V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
20 | WYATT Seth | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | TUCKER Owen J. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
22 | CRONIN Darragh J. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
23 | SIMPSON Patrick | D V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
24 | LAI Coby | V D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
25 | BINDAS Odinn A. | D V V V D D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
26 | RICHARD Owen | V D D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
27 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
28 | WANG Eric S | D D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
29 | ROWE Jason | V D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
30 | WIEDERHORN ethan | D D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | LIEF Isaac R. | D D V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
32 | SHAH Maximilian A. | D D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
33 | WADE Grayson | V V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
34 | KRONROD Tal | D V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
35 | MAGDA Daniel | D V V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
36 | HE Lawrence | V D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
37 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | V D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
38 | MAAS Sean H. | V V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
39 | LIU Jack | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
40 | MISHIMA Torata | D V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
40 | CHEN Austin | V V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
42 | GROSSMAN August | D V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
43 | PRAKASH Nikhil | D D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
44 | HA Daniel | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
45 | ALVANEZ Franki | D D V D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
46 | KUMAR Aidan | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
47 | CONNELLY Asa D. | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
48 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
49 | CRANN Sean | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
50 | COTAJ Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
51 | JENNINGS Adin | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | KUTTRUS Max D. | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
53 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
54 | LI Jeffrey | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
55 | GAO Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
56 | STANLEY Dominick | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.