MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 2 | KRAVIT Connor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
| 3 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 5 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 6 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 7 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 8 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 10 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 11 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | HA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 15 | GROSSMAN August | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | CONNELLY Asa D. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 18 | ARIETTA Rudy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 19 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
| 20 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 5% |
| 22 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 36% | 11% | 2% |
| 26 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 28 | LAI Coby | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 35% | 9% |
| 30 | SCHADE Lucas | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HALEY Aidan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | SHUM Tyler | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 50% | 20% | 4% |
| 34 | DOTSON Gus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 35 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 36 | COTAJ Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | CHEN Austin | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HURDAL Leif G. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 40 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 41 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | SEELEY Charlie | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WIEDERHORN ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | FELIX Arun J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FAN Russell | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | BARSEMIAN Alexander | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 69% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | BLANCHARD Jonah | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | MING Isaac | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | TAN Connor | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Bruce | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.