Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NEELAM Navya | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 47% |
2 | XU Serena | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
3 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
5 | FRANGER Macy | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 28% |
6 | TISMENSKY Abigail | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
7 | WU Jessica | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
8 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
9 | MA Sophie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
10 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
11 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | ||
12 | QI Julieanne | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
13 | KROPP Anne | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
14 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
15 | CHERNIS Liah | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
16 | HOLDEN Helena | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
17 | JORDAN Zoe | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
18 | PEI Claire | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
19 | CARCELLER Bernardita (Tini) | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
20 | OLELE Ifechi | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
21 | NGUYEN Renee | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 38% | 6% |
22 | ANEZIOKORO Zahra | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
23 | HE Anna | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
24 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
25 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
26 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
27 | TISMENSKY Avital | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
28 | LI Anna | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
29 | MERRIMAN Rie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | VOSKOV Olivia | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
31 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
32 | MOHAN Riya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
33 | ZHAO Yanning | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
34 | WANG Cecilia | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
35 | DESAI Ela | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
35 | LEE Kaitlyn | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
37 | TAM Connie | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
38 | WU Michelle | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
39 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - | |
40 | LEE Gloria Y. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
41 | WANG Angelina | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 52% | 22% |
42 | KARTHIK Diya | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
43 | KOU Cynthia | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
44 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 48% | 12% | |
45 | HUANG Selina | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
46 | NING Miranda | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
46 | EKSHTUT Leah | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
48 | TREPANIER Georgina | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
49 | CHEN Alina | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | ||
50 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
51 | DENEALE Lucia | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | ||
52 | OPERARIO Sofia Francesca | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
53 | ROMANOV Mia | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
54 | FU Shannon | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
55 | DYMAR Anna | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
56 | WANG Chloe | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
57 | ZHU Una | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
58 | WANG Nicole | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
59 | XU Mulan | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
60 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
61 | CHEN Madeline | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
62 | LI Carlie | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | ||
63 | LEE Adelynn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
64 | CHI Zoe | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
65 | SONG Sunny | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
66 | PETROFF Eva | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
67 | XU Jessica | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
68 | CHOI Arianna | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
69 | KONG Mila W. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
70 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
70 | KIM Vivian | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
72 | YANG Eleanor | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
73 | BURKS Madison | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
74 | RAMEY Alexa | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 4% | - |
75 | SUN Karolyn | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
76 | SUNG Audrey | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - |
77 | YOUN Kylie | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
78 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
79 | CHEN Dian | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
80 | DU Chloe | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
81 | XU Chenyu | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
82 | LEE Eden | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
83 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
84 | HALE Reagan | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
85 | DEARBORN Josie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
86 | MEGGERS Arya | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
87 | FAN Joy | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
88 | MIAO Anthea | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
89 | CAYETANO Audrey | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
89 | MIXON Ivory | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
91 | CHANG Allison | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
92 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
92 | XIONG Alice | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
94 | CHEN Stephanie | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
95 | RASHID Summer | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
96 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
97 | LI Jasmine | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
98 | YU Chloe | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
99 | ZHAO Ellie | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
100 | CHEN Julia Z. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
101 | RAJPUT Mahek | 1% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
102 | CHEN Laila | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
103 | MAENG Gloria | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
103 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
105 | LI Ariel | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
106 | RAJ Indra | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
107 | ZHAO Emma | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | ||
108 | SUN Milly | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | |
109 | XU Aasta | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
110 | WANG Chantal | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
111 | JIANG chenxi | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
112 | DESAI Eesha | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
113 | JU Jennifer | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
114 | CHO Jacey | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
115 | MOKRETSOV Leah | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
116 | LI Allison | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
117 | DU Chelsea | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
118 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
119 | REN Ivanka | 9% | 32% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
120 | ZU Jacqueline | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
121 | KIM Abigail | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
122 | MUKKU Emily | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
123 | KELLER Mia | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
124 | BERESTOVITSKY Eva | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
125 | BURROWS Beatrice | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
126 | LEE Zoe | 29% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
127 | WANG Yvonne | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
128 | YOON Claire | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
129 | NAZIR Farah | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
130 | SUN Joanna | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
131 | ARNOLD Evangeline | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
132 | HE Elsa | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | FLYNN Kensington | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
134 | VOO Evelyn | 32% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
135 | CHIN Riley | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
136 | YAN Yuzi | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.