Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 2 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 3 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 3 | WU MiEr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 5 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
| 6 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 7 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 8 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 9 | LU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 10 | LIU Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 11 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
| 12 | ZHANG Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 13 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 14 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 15 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 16 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 17 | ZHANG jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 18 | WANG Suian (Andy) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 20 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 21 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 22 | HU Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 24 | GEVA Reuben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 25 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | YOO Minwoo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 30 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 31 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 32 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 34 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | LI Bryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | WANG Mason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 37 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | SHI Zhicheng | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | PUTHOFF Henry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 40 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 41 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | MA kevin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 44 | PARK Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | BUTLER Xavier | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 46 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 49 | JU Shang | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | ZHOU Ezra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 51 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 53 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | SONG Eric | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | KHALID Ilyas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 57 | YE Andrew | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | HOLDEN Harrison | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 60 | MA yuwei | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MATUSOW Brandon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 61 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 64 | TALANDZEVICIUS Tomas | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 67 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 68 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 69 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 70 | REN Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 71 | YAO Irvine | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | CHA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 73 | TAN Samuel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | DESAI Adithya | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 76 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | CHEN Linus | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | YI Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 82 | ALI Akash | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | PELCZAR James | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 86 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 87 | WON Jacob | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | YOON Ian | 100% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | BAEK Joel | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | REED Andrew | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.