Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | XIA Dashan | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
2 | SUN Lucas | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | CHEN Jayden | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
3 | BOUDREAUX James | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
5 | DOUBOV Andrew | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
6 | NORMILE Nicholas | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
7 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
8 | AHMED Mohsen | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
9 | LI Jade | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
10 | TRAN Spencer | V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
11 | ZENG Andrew | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
12 | GAO Victor | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
13 | SOLARZ Arthur | V V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
14 | HELMY Richard | V V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
15 | GLUSHKOV David | V D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
16 | NILSEN Mark | D V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
18 | ZHAO Pierce | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
19 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
21 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | KIM Henry | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
23 | LI Ryan | V V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
24 | WANG Charles | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
25 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
26 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
27 | CZEPLA Andrew | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | SONG Aidan | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | GIORDANO Zach | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
30 | OCONNOR Paul | D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
31 | TESFAYE Elias | V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
32 | PAN Anthony | D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
33 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
34 | CAFASSO Alexander | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
35 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
36 | ZHANG Jonathan | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | CHEN Edward | V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
38 | TSIEN Richard | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
39 | CUELLAR Markus | V D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
40 | LI Ray | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
41 | DODIN Daniel M. | D D D V V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
42 | WHITE Jackson | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
43 | LUR'YE Killian | V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
43 | WU Matthew | D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
43 | NG Nico | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
43 | TOMASZEWSKI Benjamin | D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
47 | ROSIELLO Francesco | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
48 | SHAPIRO Samuel | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
49 | NOOL Alexander | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
50 | FOGEL Jake | V D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
51 | CHEN Daniel | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
52 | HE Yurui (Bronto) | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
53 | LIU Jeremy | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
53 | TOPRANI Valmik | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
55 | BRESLAV Asher | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
56 | SMITH Theo | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
57 | YU David | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
58 | LEE Kalvin | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
59 | WANG Marcus | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
60 | LEE Nicholas | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
61 | CHEN Tianjun | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
62 | LEBOWITZ Mick | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
63 | DANILOV Artur | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
64 | WELCH Sebastian | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
65 | SHI Evan | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
66 | MAZEL Antonin | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.