Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | XIA Dashan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 52% |
| 2 | SUN Lucas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | CHEN Jayden | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 5 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 7 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 8 | AHMED Mohsen | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 9 | LI Jade | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 10 | TRAN Spencer | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 11 | ZENG Andrew | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 12 | GAO Victor | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | SOLARZ Arthur | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | HELMY Richard | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 15 | GLUSHKOV David | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | NILSEN Mark | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 18 | ZHAO Pierce | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 19 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 22 | KIM Henry | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 23 | LI Ryan | 3% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 24 | WANG Charles | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 25 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
| 26 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% |
| 27 | CZEPLA Andrew | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 28 | SONG Aidan | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | GIORDANO Zach | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | OCONNOR Paul | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | TESFAYE Elias | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 32 | PAN Anthony | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | SZCZAPA Lukas | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 34 | CAFASSO Alexander | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | ZHANG Jonathan | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 37 | CHEN Edward | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | TSIEN Richard | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | CUELLAR Markus | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LI Ray | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | DODIN Daniel M. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 49% | 18% |
| 42 | WHITE Jackson | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LUR'YE Killian | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 43 | WU Matthew | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | NG Nico | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | TOMASZEWSKI Benjamin | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 49 | NOOL Alexander | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | FOGEL Jake | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | CHEN Daniel | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | HE Yurui (Bronto) | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LIU Jeremy | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TOPRANI Valmik | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 55 | BRESLAV Asher | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SMITH Theo | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | YU David | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 58 | LEE Kalvin | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | WANG Marcus | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LEE Nicholas | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | CHEN Tianjun | 11% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEBOWITZ Mick | 2% | 33% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 63 | DANILOV Artur | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | WELCH Sebastian | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | SHI Evan | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MAZEL Antonin | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.