Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
2 | MARSHALL John W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
3 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
3 | MAISEL Simon F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
5 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
6 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
7 | LENDER David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 34% | 3% |
8 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
9 | GUINAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
10 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
11 | ROSTAL Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
12 | MAURER Scott J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
13 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
14 | OH Kevin Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
15 | TANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | - |
16 | MAAS Cameron T. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
17 | WOZNIAK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
18 | SCHULTZ Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
19 | TUCKER Brad W. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
20 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
21 | OH Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
22 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
23 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
24 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
25 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
26 | ZEKO David J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | CHO Tyler H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
28 | ZUBECK Dominic | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
29 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
30 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
31 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
32 | SYED Saif M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
33 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
34 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
35 | MAYER Vinzenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
36 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
37 | HAMILTON Kevin | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | STENCEL Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
39 | MARTIN Liam N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
40 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
42 | CHO Brandon H. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | MARTIN Dirk | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
43 | HONG James | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
45 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
47 | KELSEY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
48 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
49 | MILLER Joshua J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
50 | KRIEGISCH Jacob A. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | MARCUSON Timothy C. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | SHAH Manan | 100% | 62% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
54 | CORRALES Nikolas | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.